There are many new technologies that impact our educational system in today’s society, from podcasting to teaching and learning through instructional television. Students have many opportunities to learn in different ways. Many of the new technologies are allowing students to learn at a distance. The use of iPods are becoming more popular for students to review lessons and lectures while commuting or going about their daily business. While others are learning online at their own pace. How does this affect our future and the traditional face-to-face courses? Will they become obsolete? This is a question that both intrigues and concerns me. Ngu (2002) defined online learning as,
Learners who follow online instruction are expected to engage in a self-paced learning strategy (Fischer & Scharff, 1998); and in addition, they are expected to engage in a variety of online communications such as asynchronous (or synchronous) interaction with other learners and instructor, virtual field trips, email, and voice communication through internet audio streaming (Wang, Hinn, & Arvan, 2001; Kumari, 2001; Carr-Chellman and Duchastel, 2000; Fischer & Scharff, 1998). The nature of collaborative learning within the online course design normally encourages group participation to generate online group project or ideas to solve an issue. (paragraph 3)
Ngu described face to face instruction as,
In contrast, face-to-face instruction requires academic staff to give lectures and have students attend face-to-face tutorial. This face-to-face instruction requires lecturers to engage in interpersonal contact, social contact, and non-verbal communication with students. It is possible that direct contact with the instructor in traditional face-to-face settings may still contain some stigma that prevents students from communicating freely with their instructor. (paragraph 3)
Although both methods are engaging, which is most preferable and benefits the students the most? According to Lester and King (2009), “Course format appeared to have no impact on perceived knowledge gained. The averages were virtually identical for both online and face-to-face students” (p. 15). Students perceptions changed but the end results were the same. Does this mean we can do away with face-to-face instruction without any discord? In my opinion, both methods are beneficial and should be continued. Students should have a choice in their preferred learning environment. Some prefer interacting with people face-to-face. Whereas, others may want the convenience of working at their own pace on their own time with an online learning environment. The use of new technologies can have a great impact on technology. But which method of instruction should be up to the students. (I am referring to those who select their own educational path, post secondary of course!)
References:
Lester, P., & King, C. (2009). Analog vs. digital instruction and learning:
teaching within first and second life environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2). Retrieved April 10, 2009, from http://commfaculty.fullerton.edu/lester/writings/face_sl_study.pdf
Ngu, B. (2002, November). Online instruction versus face-to-face instruction at UNIMAS. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1). Retreived April 10, 2009, from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/IJET/v3n1/ngu/index.html